Summary
In TV and radio ads two conservative groups greatly overstate the burden that the federal estate tax puts on heirs to a family farm or business.
One ad claims the federal estate tax “can bury your family in crippling tax bills,” which is untrue for nearly all of those who will see the ad, including the large majority of farm and business owners. Both ads claim the estate tax is a “double tax,” which is only partly true, and mostly false when it comes to very wealthy families.
We take no position on whether the estate tax should or should not be repealed permanently. The claims made in these one-sided ads, however, present a misleading picture of who is actually affected by the tax.
Analysis
The American Family Business Institute and Free Enterprise Fund launched a TV and radio ad campaign May 10 that targets potential swing votes in the Senate for full repeal of the estate tax. The group said it will run different versions of the 30-second and 60-second ads in Montana, South Dakota, North Dakota, Maine, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nevada and New York as part of a $15 million campaign leading up to a Senate vote expected before the August recess.
American Family Business Institute Radio Ad: “Nightmare”
Announcer: You work hard all your life. You pay your taxes and play by the rules, and, yeah, you’re proud of what you’ve accomplished. You’d like to leave your family farm or business to your kids. It’s a legacy, something they can hold onto. It’s the American dream, right? But the IRS death tax can turn that dream into a nightmare. When you die, the IRS can bury your family in crippling tax bills. It can cost them everything. What’s worse, the death tax is a double tax on all you’ve worked to build. The death tax is wrong. It’s unfair. And this year, Montana’s family business owners and farmers have joined together to kill this unjust tax, before it destroys one more family legacy. It’s time for Sen. Max Baucus to stand with Montana family businesses and farms and vote to end the death tax.
“Your Family”?
Contrary to ad’s claim that “your family” might be crippled, the vast majority of families actually are not affected by the estate tax. In fact, less than 3 percent of deceased adults in 2002 had estates subject to the tax, according to the nonpartisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center and figures from the IRS.
And though the ad focuses on family farms and businesses, the truth is that very few actually pay the estate tax. The Tax Policy Center projects that roughly 440 taxable estates were primarily made up of farm and business assets in 2004.
And even considering estates for which farming or business was a sideline, the Center found only 7,090 taxable estates for 2004 that included any farm or business income. That’s still just 38 percent of all taxable estates. The fact is that repealing the estate tax entirely, as the ad advocates, would benefit mostly non-farmers and non-business-owners.
The ad would have been accurate had it said that “some families” are affected.
“Cost Them Everything?”
Far from imposing tax bills on farms and businesses that “cost them everything,” the average estate tax paid by all farm and business estates in 2004 was just under 20 percent of the value of the estate, according to calculations by the Tax Policy Center.
The effective rate was far less for smaller estates. Of the 440 taxable family farm and business estates in 2004, two out of five paid an average rate of only 1.6 percent. These were taxable estates valued at less than $2 million.Very large estates valued at over $20 million paid at an average effective rate of just over 22 percent, a hefty tax bite but well short of “everything.”
These effective rates are not to be confused with the top rate, which is currently 47 percent. But that marginal rate applies only to what is taxed, and currently the first $1.5 million of an estate is exempt. The Tax Policy Center’s figures are an average effective rate on the entire estate, including any proceeds of life insurance. The taxable portion is often reduced further through charitable contributions or special provisions that allow most farms to reduce the taxable value of their real property by 40 to 70 percent of market value.
The following table shows how many taxable farm or business estates fell into various size categories, the average amount of tax and the effective tax rate they paid, according to the center’s calculations:
These 440 taxable estates are those for which farm or business assets made up at least half the total value of the estate. They represent only 2 percent of all 18,800 taxable estates in 2004.
Worth noting is that family-owned farms and closely held businesses already receive special treatment under current law. Heirs who agree to keep the farm or business assets within the family for 10 years after death can reduce the taxable amount of the estate by 40 percent to 70 percent. And if the farm or business is at least 35 percent of the gross value of the estate, payments can be spread out over 14 years.
AFBI TV Ad: “Generations”
Announcer: They freed the world from tyranny, then came home to build family businesses and farms. Heroes in war and peace. They paid taxes all their lives, but not the IRS hits this “Greatest Generation” with an unjust double tax, the death tax.
Don Malarkey (WWII Vet): In war and peace, my generation stood up for what’s right. Join us now and help us end the unfair death tax.
Announcer: Tell Max Baucus to side with family business, not the IRS.
“Double Tax?”
Emotional Appeals
Media
Watch AFBI Ad: “Generations”
Sources
Leonard Burman, William Gale, and Jeffrey Rohaly, “Options to Reform the Estate Tax,” Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, Tax Policy Issues and Options No. 10, March 2005.
Tax Policy Center, Table T04-0164, “Current-Law Distribution of Gross Estate and Net Estate Tax By Size of Gross Estate, 2004: Returns With Any Farm or Business Assets.”
Tax Policy Center, Table T04-0163 , “Current-Law Distribution of Gross Estate and Net Estate Tax By Size of Gross Estate, 2004: Farms and Businesses.”
Leonard Burman and William Gale, “The Estate Tax is Down, But Not Out.” Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, Tax Policy Issues and Options No. 2, December 2001.
Scott Weisbenner and James Poterba, “The Distributional Burden of Taxing Estates and Unrealized Capital Gains at Death,” Rethinking Estate and Gift Taxation, eds. W.G. Gale, J.R. Hines, and J. Slemrod (Washington: Brookings Institution, 2001) 422-449.